Air Force's stealth fighters making final flights

News posted by members of this site. If you want to publish your own article or have something of value for the front page please indicate it as such.
Before posting make sure it hasn't already been posted. Write a concise and pertinent intro if you are going to post here.

Moderator: Site Admin

Forum rules
Check for duplicates before posting, otherwise post it in the original thread. If you want to post an article of your own or find it significant for the front page please let us know. Rangers Lead the Way
Post Reply
BruteForce
US Army Veteran
Posts: 840
Joined: July 11th, 2006, 4:40 pm

Air Force's stealth fighters making final flights

Post by BruteForce »

DAYTON, Ohio (AP) -- The world's first attack aircraft to employ stealth technology is slipping quietly into history.

Technicians service an F-117 stealth fighter after it arrived at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base in Dayton, Ohio, on Monday.

The inky black, angular, radar-evading F-117, which spent 27 years in the Air Force arsenal secretly patrolling hostile skies from Serbia to Iraq, will be put in mothballs next month in Nevada.

Wright-Patterson Air Force Base in Dayton, Ohio, which manages the F-117 program, will have an informal, private retirement ceremony Tuesday with military leaders, base employees and representatives from Holloman Air Force Base in New Mexico.

The last F-117s scheduled to fly will leave Holloman on April 21, stop in Palmdale, California, for another retirement ceremony, then arrive on April 22 at their final destination: Tonopah Test Range Airfield in Nevada, where the jet made its first flight in 1981.

More Follows

---

I had no idea the F117 was that old. I suppose the new F22 Raptor in conjunction with B2's will replace.
US Army 1986 - 1994
InfoSec/InfraGard/NetGuard (1994 - Present)
Random world and Adventures of BruteForce
RTO
BANNED
Posts: 9104
Joined: April 28th, 2005, 12:34 pm

Post by RTO »

Although sad, I guess it makes more sense to dedicate funds to keep newer technology flying rather than pouring millions into upkeep of the older fighters.

Those F22 Raptor's are baddass!
CloakAndDagger
US Army Veteran
Posts: 377
Joined: July 19th, 2004, 8:37 pm

Post by CloakAndDagger »

I can't say I'm too surprised that they are being retired...neat aircraft, but I'm sure the exotic skin was expensive and a pain to fix dings and dents, and with all the angles, was never a stable flyer, which I'm sure induced a toll on the aircraft structure.

All-in-all, it had a pretty good run run for an out-of-the-box design.
Chiron
Ranger
Posts: 11919
Joined: February 17th, 2004, 12:49 pm

,

Post by Chiron »

The F-35s are not bad also.

My guess is that the F-117s mission is being taken by one of the new aircraft and this is one of the steps of evolution.
RS Class 5-82
French Commando 11-83
LRSLC Class 5-87
U.S. Army 1980-1984 and 1987-1990
---------
“Never tell people how to do things. Tell them what to do and they will surprise you with their ingenuity.”
George S. Patton
User avatar
RetPara
Ranger
Posts: 415
Joined: June 16th, 2004, 6:44 pm

Post by RetPara »

The B3 is also in the production line.

From StrategyPage.com

Breaking Silence About the B-3
March 10, 2008: Stung by rumors that they were not serious about developing a new heavy bomber, the U.S. Air Force announced that it was developing such an aircraft, that it would be in service by 2018, and would be able to operate with, or without, a crew. The implication was that the design of the new bomber was already quite advanced, and that it was, like the B-2, being handled as a "black project" (all work done in secrecy, until ready for production.)



The new bomber would be similar to the current B-2 in many ways. That is, it would be stealthy, have a crew of only two, and be capable of staying in the air for over 24 hours at a time. The "B-3" would probably also be capable of super-cruise (travelling long distances at very high speeds), and would definitely have a full array of the latest sensors and communications capabilities. The biggest potential problem is cost. The B-2 bombers were so expensive that only 21 were built. One recently crashed. Adding in the development expenses, each B-2 cost about two billion dollars. If the B-3 costs a lot more, the air force will have a hard time selling it to Congress. This would be the case even if the air force came up with a design that amounted to a "semi-space" ship, that travelled at hypersonic speeds (enabling it to reach any point on the planet in a few hours). Price has definitely become a factor, and that may be why the air force has been reluctant to release any details on the next generation heavy bomber.
RS2 84-86

Intelligence in a person can be measured.... Stupidity is a bottomless pit which is beyond measure....
Post Reply

Return to “The News Dump”