OK NOW I'M PISSED OFF, I RESPONDED TO YOUR PM ON WHAT TO READ AND EVEN HOW TO GIVE A PROPER INTRO AND YOU COME BACK TO THIS THREAD IN THE WRONG FORUM AND GIVE YOUR "INTRO"NorthDakotaKid wrote:I am 26 and live in North Dakota. I completed my MBA in 2004, I currently work for a 5 year old internet company as an operations analyst.
I passed on the Navy out of grad school after competing the PT test with above average scores,but due to the delay of my fiance's graduation, which will occur in 2006, I chose to not continue the process.
I am interested in becoming a Ranger and know that the offiicer billets are very competitive. Physically I would like to think that with more trianing I could achieve above average marks, I competed in college football as a linebacker, so I would consider myself athletic.
I was informed by a fellow peer of mine from high school who had become a Ranger that the Army was a much more family friendly military than the Navy.
I am interested in knowing what, from your experiences, makes a better officer. Enlisted or OCS. I know that some believe that through tthe ranks of enlistment that you gainh an understanding of the specific parts of your squad, but as an officer you recieve better leadership training. Understanding that I have had allot of schooling and would like to put it to the best use, functionally please speak your minds.
Your opinions are appreciated.
I am not here for the college money. I already have sunk in the cost for my own education. I know that this is a huge F8ck you in this community, I footed my own bill and I am not inquiring into how much money I get out of it. Ao please, I am not trying to insult anyone here.
BEAT YOUR FACE NUMBNUTS, AND DON'T STOP TILL YOU FIGURE OUT WHERE YOU ARE, WHAT IN THE HELL YOU "THINK" YOU'RE SUPPOSED TO DO BESIDES SHUTTIN YOUR TRAP!
See what happens when you try the kinder gentler route, they always crap it all up anyways....... (even so called Grad Students WTF!?!)

I'm goin back to my old evil ways, fuck it!!!
