Too much armor robbing Marines of speed in combat

News posted by members of this site. If you want to publish your own article or have something of value for the front page please indicate it as such.
Before posting make sure it hasn't already been posted. Write a concise and pertinent intro if you are going to post here.

Moderator: Site Admin

Forum rules
Check for duplicates before posting, otherwise post it in the original thread. If you want to post an article of your own or find it significant for the front page please let us know. Rangers Lead the Way
rgrpuck
Ranger/Moderator
Posts: 7846
Joined: November 24th, 2004, 1:33 pm

Re: Too much armor robbing Marines of speed in combat

Post by rgrpuck »

Rangertom wrote:Solution: Make uniform wear a commander’s decision as part of the COA development.

Bingo ...this has been a topic of conversation, with my commander and I, quite frequently lately.
CSM RGRPUCK
CL 3-88

Operation Just Cause (Dec- Jan 89)
Operation Enduring Freedom (Jan-aug '03)
Operation Iraqi Freedom (Jan- July "04)
Operation Enduring Freedom (Jan 07- Jan 08 )
Operation Enduring Freedom (Aug 09- Jan 10 )
User avatar
K.Ingraham
Ranger
Posts: 6143
Joined: January 25th, 2005, 11:59 am

Re: Too much armor robbing Marines of speed in combat

Post by K.Ingraham »

1998. Not long after the wag-the-dog Kosovo debacle, when someone tried to call slickWillie on his phony war, Hillery's husband replied "We fought a war for forty days with zero casualties, now I call that success by any measure" (typing from memory so quote might not be exact but is close enough to make my point).
POTUS: Zero casualties = military success. Not one thought about what strategic or moral goals our nation might have had, beyond distracting the electorate that is, or if any of those goals (if there indeed were any) had been achieved.
Lets see...ROE so restrictive that it was nigh on impossible to effectively strike targets or perform BDA, spend a kabillion dollars worth of "smart" weapons, lose rare F-117s and degrade the arsenal, enable the genocide the bombing was somehow supposed to stop, spend billions, risk many lives and kill dozens of Serbs for no achievable goal and success for the allegedly most powerful nation in history is defined as "none of our guys got killed".

Eighteen men killed in Somalia on a messy, but successful misson and the cabinet meets - and never once mentions, much less discusses that most salient consideration "are we closer to the goals we deployed TFR to achieve?" - but instead ponders that mornings opinion columns and orders us to flee like little girls before TFR has even finished cleaning their weapons.

And the "Candidate for Change" just built an administration made up largely of that former regimes "thinkers".

Our wars will now rely even more on standoff "smart" weapons, UAVs, force protection measures, huffing and puffing and public image management supported by interrogations that begin with "pretty please, will you...".

Please, may I turn out to be wrong about where we're going, but the evidence from where we've been doesn't support any other conclusion.
http://www.75thrra.com/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
2d Bn U.D. for 75th Ranger Regt Assn

2d Bn(Ranger)75 Inf 1975-'77
RS 9-76
Former mentor to RANGER XCrunner.

"I am well aware that by no means equal repute attends the narrator and the doer of deedsSallust ‘The Catiline Conspiracy’
BadMuther
BANNED
Posts: 7970
Joined: March 14th, 2003, 2:13 am

Re: Too much armor robbing Marines of speed in combat

Post by BadMuther »

rgrpuck wrote:
BadMuther wrote:I'm speaking out of nievity(sp?) here..... when and at what level can a commander make the decision to go w/out armor for a mission or just go plate carrier?

Battalion will recommend it. But B rigade will be the approveing authority.
Thanks for the input.















K. Ingraham, oh, but you forget Scott Grady, surviving on "only" an MRE and a half per day!! :P
Post Reply

Return to “The News Dump”