Army recruits who get in despite bad conduct promoted faster

News posted by members of this site. If you want to publish your own article or have something of value for the front page please indicate it as such.
Before posting make sure it hasn't already been posted. Write a concise and pertinent intro if you are going to post here.

Moderator: Site Admin

Forum rules
Check for duplicates before posting, otherwise post it in the original thread. If you want to post an article of your own or find it significant for the front page please let us know. Rangers Lead the Way
User avatar
Silverback
Ranger
Posts: 20119
Joined: March 7th, 2004, 11:06 pm

Post by Silverback »

Ops NCO wrote:I didn't. Neither that thread nor this one discussed jump school as an "elite" school, or implied that standards in other units were as high as those in the Regiment. The discussion is about whether initial entry requirements and training are being lowered below their already pretty low standards. Are you saying only Rangers have earned the right to discuss this issue?
You'll notice that from time to time I will dig a hole for the simple pleasure of watching someone fall into it.
RC 2-87
3-75 84/85, 95/97
"thnks 4 pratn merku!"
Kilted Heathen
Tadpole
Posts: 4542
Joined: November 12th, 2004, 4:52 pm

Post by Kilted Heathen »

Silverback wrote:
Ops NCO wrote:I didn't. Neither that thread nor this one discussed jump school as an "elite" school, or implied that standards in other units were as high as those in the Regiment. The discussion is about whether initial entry requirements and training are being lowered below their already pretty low standards. Are you saying only Rangers have earned the right to discuss this issue?
You'll notice that from time to time I will dig a hole for the simple pleasure of watching someone fall into it.
Yep. He's done it to me several times.

Profilers should show-case this fucker...
312th LRS 1st CAV 89-91
RS 12-91
RI 4RTB 92-94
H Co.121(ABN)(LRS)04-PRESENT
WTC PRC 05-06
OIF 06-07
WTC PRC 07-2010
TF Wolf MUTC 2010-

"The lapdance is always better when the stripper is crying"

The trouble with Scotland is it's full of Scots!
Rock Island Ranger
Ranger
Posts: 10935
Joined: February 8th, 2004, 10:00 pm

Post by Rock Island Ranger »

Silverback wrote:
Ops NCO wrote:I didn't. Neither that thread nor this one discussed jump school as an "elite" school, or implied that standards in other units were as high as those in the Regiment. The discussion is about whether initial entry requirements and training are being lowered below their already pretty low standards. Are you saying only Rangers have earned the right to discuss this issue?
You'll notice that from time to time I will dig a hole for the simple pleasure of watching someone fall into it.
I also noticed that once you went on hair growth status, the time you have to waste is impressive. 8)
RS Class # 7-76

I'm not the way I am because I was a Ranger - I was a Ranger because of the way I am.

¿Querría usted el primer redondo en la rodilla o la cara?

The road goes on forever and the party never ends.
ANGRYCivilian
Tadpole
Posts: 2143
Joined: July 16th, 2004, 9:02 am

Post by ANGRYCivilian »

I wish this topic would get on track. I'm curious if this is actually an issue or just "news" material. The %'s don't seem that far apart for soldiers that have needed waivers for criminal activity and those who have not, for stat counters like UCMJ, awards, re-enlistment, etc.
St Barbara's Bastards
82C1P

"Parole officer says I gotta upgrade, or he won't give me back my stabbin' knife!"~Roberto
coldsteal2
Veteran: US Army/US Navy
Posts: 121
Joined: December 16th, 2006, 9:44 pm

Post by coldsteal2 »

I really dont know what to think about all of this really
SGT USArmy Retired/Disabled
B 1/44 ADA 9th ID Ft Lewis 88-91 16R10 Vulcan Gunner
31M 63rd ARCOM 88 Oceanside CA
also
RM2 USN 1983-1988
NAVCOMMSTA SD 84-86
32nd ST NAVSTA 86-87
USS Merrill DD 976 86-87
NAS PENSACOLA Naval Aircrewman 87-88
User avatar
RangerJurena
Ranger/Moderator
Posts: 3301
Joined: September 27th, 2005, 11:00 am

Post by RangerJurena »

BruteForce wrote:What I find interesting is that in parallel to this article are others that indicate how gang-bangers are joining the Army to acquire marksmanship training and recruit internally (from within the Army).

Seems that after these thugs complete their obligation, they go back to wherever they came from and proficiently cross-train the other gang-bangers in marksmanship, automatic weapons use, etc.

I saw a story on Dateline where they also get a position in S4 (Supply) and start stealing/selling Army equipment (weapons, clothing, etc.).

Although I understand the requirement to fill the ranks, lowering standards may not be the appropriate method..
I think you put to much faith in the media reports.

The Army was, is and will always be a microcosm of society. There will be supply guys who steal, combat leaders who abuse what they learn, sex offenders, rapists, thugs and thieves who embarass all of us.

As for lowering the standards, I don't know about all that, my son tried to enlist, he has some misdemeanor blemishes and a repaired ACL. According to his recruiter, " he needs too many waivers, today's Army does not rehabilitate".

For those that got in due to a lower standard, more power to them, I hope they continue to serve with honor and distiction.
C.Co 1/75 '87-'93
6-89
http://www.75thrra.org" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; - are you a member?
_______________
Mentor to inter06(3/75) and grj5001(1/75)
BruteForce
US Army Veteran
Posts: 840
Joined: July 11th, 2006, 4:40 pm

Post by BruteForce »

RangerJurena wrote: I think you put to much faith in the media reports.

The Army was, is and will always be a microcosm of society. There will be supply guys who steal, combat leaders who abuse what they learn, sex offenders, rapists, thugs and thieves who embarass all of us.

As for lowering the standards, I don't know about all that, my son tried to enlist, he has some misdemeanor blemishes and a repaired ACL. According to his recruiter, " he needs too many waivers, today's Army does not rehabilitate".

For those that got in due to a lower standard, more power to them, I hope they continue to serve with honor and distiction.
Good points..
US Army 1986 - 1994
InfoSec/InfraGard/NetGuard (1994 - Present)
Random world and Adventures of BruteForce
Post Reply

Return to “The News Dump”