Modern Army Combatives

Hand to Hand, Combative Skills, etc...
Post Reply
User avatar
musicmano3596
Paratrooper
Posts: 27
Joined: November 12th, 2014, 2:43 pm

Modern Army Combatives

Post by musicmano3596 »

Hey Rangers and Vets,

Wondering what opinions any of you may have in regards to the army's new MAC program. I have a small amount of experience in it (Lvl 1, working on 2), but I am sure their are those on the page that have much more.

In my opinion as of now, is that the army could have chosen/developed a much more applicable hand to hand program. Krav Maga (Which I have 6 months experience in) would be a more appropriate program. I have been told Judo has applicable portions to "real world" scenarios as well, though I have yet to recieve any form of instruction in it.

What are some other opinions on this page?
Infantryman
Currently overseas assigned to 4th Brigade (Airborne), 25th Infantry Division.
Sparta Lives!
User avatar
rangertough
Ranger/Moderator
Posts: 1675
Joined: January 27th, 2005, 3:02 pm

Re: Modern Army Combatives

Post by rangertough »

musicmano3596 wrote:Hey Rangers and Vets,

Wondering what opinions any of you may have in regards to the army's new MAC program. I have a small amount of experience in it (Lvl 1, working on 2), but I am sure their are those on the page that have much more.

In my opinion as of now, is that the army could have chosen/developed a much more applicable hand to hand program. Krav Maga (Which I have 6 months experience in) would be a more appropriate program. I have been told Judo has applicable portions to "real world" scenarios as well, though I have yet to recieve any form of instruction in it.

What are some other opinions on this page?
I was there when it started. The problem with MAC is it's mutation from a relatively easy to learn, adjustable force H2H system, that is executable in armor. To a recruiting tool, taught by a bunch of douches that think they're the next UFC champ.

According to Matt Larsen (to paraphrase) "If all you remember from Combatives is to close the gap, achieve the clinch, takedown to the mount and feed the guy his teeth with your elbow, you've learned the essence of the system." When we first started we talked about head butts with helmets and creatively using the environment to make your opponent stop doing whatever made you kick his ass, they don't discus that anymore instead they roll in their custom MACP Tapout shorts. The system was designed to be trained on grass in shirt sleeves. The Combatives facilities have an Octagon for fucks sake. I was disappointed when a portion of Level 4 training was running a fight bracket.

The ground fighting portion of the system is based mostly on BJJ which in my opinion should have been Japanese Ju-Juitsu. Seeing that MAC is supposed to be focused on techniques that are "Armor Capable" and the Japanese style was developed for Samurai IN ARMOR. The Gracies were the name in BJJ at the time and the style you could easily get access to was "Tournament" (eg. With a Gi). The stand up was based on American boxing/kickboxing and focused way to much on closed hands and not enough on elbows and palm strikes. Low leg kicks being about the only kick you might pull off when your torso has an added 45-60 lbs of equipment on it.

Judo focuses on throws and takedowns many of which involve moving your body in ways that are impossible in combat equipment.

Krav Maga is an impressive art that is great for severely beating or killing someone but isn't really adjustable regarding amount of force. For example if a crazy old lady comes after one of my guys with a frying pan while we are conducting a search. In that scenario with KM I can continually and rapidly beat her to death. With MAC I can put a blood choke on her, secure her and not have the death of a crazy old lady on my conscience.
Rangertough
"Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?"
C CO/HHC 2/75 '93-97, Bragg '97-'99, HHC/C CO/A CO 2/75 99'-'01 RS 8-94.
User avatar
Slowpoke
Ranger/Moderator
Posts: 7786
Joined: September 14th, 2003, 9:50 pm

Re: Modern Army Combatives

Post by Slowpoke »

I studied Judo for three years in High School, back when the books were written on papyrus. I prefer it to the more attack types of combative because it's so much fun to see an overeager attacker sail through the air and land in a painful heap. If nothing else, it taught me to land gracefully when knocked on my ass.
I never wore a cape, but I still have my dog tags.

Experienced Peek Freak!!

173rd Abn LRRP...'66/'67
C/1/506 101st Abn
B/2/325 82nd Abn
User avatar
musicmano3596
Paratrooper
Posts: 27
Joined: November 12th, 2014, 2:43 pm

Re: Modern Army Combatives

Post by musicmano3596 »

Ranger tough, I almost feel like a better system for fighting in kit (at least basics) would be not give a single piece of instruction. Just put Joe's in full rattle and let them at each other and keep it at 50% :lol:
Infantryman
Currently overseas assigned to 4th Brigade (Airborne), 25th Infantry Division.
Sparta Lives!
User avatar
fatboy
Ranger
Posts: 1058
Joined: November 26th, 2006, 12:30 pm

Re: Modern Army Combatives

Post by fatboy »

Bumping this one back up. MAC was fine for teaching guys how to stop being afraid of their shadow, absorb a punch or two, and get control their opponents. The main problem is the levels they came up with. When you start with ground fighting, but don't teach how to accomplish it you set yourself up for failure.
IMO, the levels should have started with weapons at arms length / striking, then take downs to a dominant position, and ground fighting (singles and in teams). All done slick then in gear. Where the system shines is the ability to train at close to full speed, all the way up to the pain level once the basics were mastered.
And for the record, my experience with it was 10 years worth of at least weekly and sometimes daily use and instruction.
RS 07 and 08-01 (I took the long tour in Florida)

1-508 ABCT
1-327IN
101st Pathfinder DS1
Iraqi Freedom 03-04, 05-06, 07-08
User avatar
musicmano3596
Paratrooper
Posts: 27
Joined: November 12th, 2014, 2:43 pm

Re: Modern Army Combatives

Post by musicmano3596 »

Fatboy,

I do agree with the statement "Where the system shines is the ability to train at close to full speed, all the way up to the pain level once the basics were mastered."

I actually discovered that there is a Krav Maga studio in anchorage and I am very much looking forward to being able to pick back up my Krav Maga training once we get out of this retarded place that can't be called a country :roll:
Infantryman
Currently overseas assigned to 4th Brigade (Airborne), 25th Infantry Division.
Sparta Lives!
User avatar
fatboy
Ranger
Posts: 1058
Joined: November 26th, 2006, 12:30 pm

Re: Modern Army Combatives

Post by fatboy »

musicmano3596 wrote:Fatboy,

I do agree with the statement "Where the system shines is the ability to train at close to full speed, all the way up to the pain level once the basics were mastered."

I actually discovered that there is a Krav Maga studio in anchorage and I am very much looking forward to being able to pick back up my Krav Maga training once we get out of this retarded place that can't be called a country :roll:
The key part in all of that is "once the basics were mastered." It never failed that there was always that guy that wanted to go full tilt in the first few minutes. My SOP for taking care of that was to then use them as the training dummy for showing what some one getting choked out looked like. That never failed to enforce that the basics were needed first.
RS 07 and 08-01 (I took the long tour in Florida)

1-508 ABCT
1-327IN
101st Pathfinder DS1
Iraqi Freedom 03-04, 05-06, 07-08
User avatar
centermass
Ranger Admin/RIP Ranger
Posts: 5895
Joined: February 26th, 2005, 11:32 am
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 8 times

Re: Modern Army Combatives

Post by centermass »

ScreenHunter_539 Mar. 29 13.38.jpg
:lol:
RS 8-81
Mentor to Rock2/75
US Army Retired 1977-1999

Remember, always be yourself....unless you're Batman. In that case, be Batman.
User avatar
rangerjd
Ranger
Posts: 1136
Joined: August 20th, 2014, 11:50 am

Re: Modern Army Combatives

Post by rangerjd »

centermass wrote:
ScreenHunter_539 Mar. 29 13.38.jpg
:lol:
Now that's funny right there. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Ranger Class 8-82
C Co 2/75 80-83-HCMTC 83-85
Drill Sgt 85-87-Sapper Instructor 87-89
A Co 2/75 89-90-G3 I Corps 90-91
I Corps LRSC 91-93-7th RTB RI 94-95
Retired 95
"I'd rather spend 10 seconds in the saddle, than a life time of watching from the stands." Chris Ledoux
Post Reply

Return to “Close Combat”