In another forum they were talking about this(SOCOM as its own branch).
http://forums.military.com/1/OpenTopic? ... =149100641
There are some good points made, like using specops guys as an image, and losing their elite. :)
For all those "Who's the best" questions
Moderator: Site Admin
I just read that...prime example of people talking out there ass...number77 wrote:In another forum they were talking about this(SOCOM as its own branch).
http://forums.military.com/1/OpenTopic? ... =149100641
There are some good points made, like using specops guys as an image, and losing their elite. :)
What "good points" were being made? GH was doing his best to control the stupidity that flows over that site......................
The good points for against it that i saw.
Each service would lose their elite.
Services would no longer be able to use their SpecOps as advertisment. (the Navy commercials talk about S.E.A.L.s and they have an Army commercial that talks about SF and Rangers)
People that fail it (there would be tons). How would you decide where to put them?
Each service would lose their elite.
Services would no longer be able to use their SpecOps as advertisment. (the Navy commercials talk about S.E.A.L.s and they have an Army commercial that talks about SF and Rangers)
People that fail it (there would be tons). How would you decide where to put them?
